How likely is it that the world we live in is virtual? Starting from the controversies surrounding the double-slit interference experiment, to concepts such as superposition, quantum entanglement, indistinguishability, spin, polarization, path integral, probability waves, and probability amplitudes, and even including numerous public statements from experts and celebrities in logic and probability theory. We made a bold hypothesis: there is a very high probability that we live in a virtual world, one that follows preset fundamental rules and operational mechanisms, and dynamically adjusts and optimizes itself.
Based on this hypothesis, we have studied a large number of texts and applications related to I Ching, Zi Wei Dou Shu, Liu Yao, Liu Ren, Hetu Luoshu, Huangdi Neijing, Tarot, Gypsy Cross, Hexagram, and Seven Planets. We discovered an interesting point: most divination practices are probability predictions. To some extent, they might merely be a "set of mathematical models under system settings." Assuming a limited quantum system, there must be finite computational power. Therefore, when you "observe this matter," the corresponding calculations and results manifest, while the rest do not consume computational resources. We call this process of "observation" as "telekinesis," encompassing concepts such as heartfelt intentions and the transmission of thought. During the process of thought, we found that positive and sincere intentions, self-awareness, and self-reflection are most likely to form stronger quantum field effects and channel collapse effects, thereby achieving entangled states.
In other words, we have essentially arrived at the most probable manifestation through extensive calculations, maintaining a relatively stable accuracy. Interested friends can download and try it out. We welcome everyone to comment and share their experiences. "The mind is principle, achieve good knowledge, and unify knowledge and action." We wish everyone all the best.